Homeowners often ask about rebates or incentives that will help them make improvements to their home. And recently, I went to a Green Building Expo in downtown Chicago where a panel spoke on this very topic and the underlying message that I came away with is:

 

“The money is out there, so go get it…”

 

It’s true – for business owners, homeowners, and building owners, basically anyone. If you are contemplating on making improvements to your home, business, or investment property, visit the Database for State Incentives for Renewables and Efficiency. This organization compiles ALL of the available incentives and rebates across the nation to help making improvements more affordable. These improvements range from replacing a refrigerator or washing machine with an ENERGY STAR unit to adding renewable energy generation to your building. The rebates and incentives include state, federal, utility, and non-profit organization looking to make an impact. If you are building a new home, consider getting a HERS Rating so you may qualify for the $2000 Builder Tax Credit.

 

Some of these programs require an energy audit up front (and maybe after the improvements have been made too). As a person who has devoted my professional career to performance testing on buildings, I think it is slightly crazy to make alterations or improvements to a building without performance testing BEFORE and AFTER the measure was installed. Think about it – would a surgeon want to remove a tumor from a cancer patient without first taking images of the patient to determine the size/location of the tumor? After removal, wouldn’t the surgeon want to take images to see if the tumor was effectively removed?

 

I am not trying to compare building improvements to cancer; I’m just trying to set the tone for an industry where ‘improvements’ are largely just guesses at what will work. Performance testing is key to making improvements to a building, and incentives/rebates are the link to getting building owners to make moves.

 

If you are considering improving your property, contact us and we’ll gladly find your largest opportunities for improvement and link you with any rebates that you qualify for.

Posted in General Topics, Incentives and Rebates | Comments Off

Corbett demonstrates how insane grocery store shoppers can be, with a little ground coffee and a carbon monoxide detector. HINT: the lethal level for carbon monoxide (CO) is 400 parts per million (ppm).

Posted in General Topics, Health & Safety | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off


Earth Week at Richland Community College in Decatur Illinois

Posted in General Topics, Uncategorized | Comments Off

Hi Corbett-
Just read your article on the high-rise testing you did, and wondered how this new high rise could meet the fire codes if there was that much communication between floors, the stairways and the elevator shaft.
If smoke or fumes from a fire below could infiltrate the unit you tested that easily, it could be huge repair bill at a minimum and perhaps fatal to the occupants if they were home.
What would you recommend to reduce their smoke and fume exposure in the event of a fire?
Chris M.
-_-_-
Hi Chris-
EXACTLY. Once you start testing big expensive multifamily buildings, it’s kind of scary what often gets missed. This is not unusual, and there’s probably nothing to be done about the issue you describe- hopefully they have fire-activated dampers. Thanks for writing man!
Looking Forward,
Corbett

Posted in General Topics, Health & Safety, Multifamily Buildings | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off

To the Editor of the Chicago Tribune:

I was thrilled to see your reporters’ attention to the details of carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning in the January 28 story on the tragic death of two women in their Chicago home. As a professional who tests furnaces and water heaters every day, I can tell you that almost no one truly understands the incredible danger, or the commonness, of low-level CO poisoning.

As pointed out in the article by Ms. Nix and Mr. Sadovi, CO is cumulative, so low levels will eventually add up to a massive overdose of the odorless toxin. And what is even more alarming: any CO detector that’s UL-listed is required NOT to sound if there are low levels of CO. Unfortunately, every other article I saw in major news outlets neglected to cover facts like this, so again, I commend your paper for fully covering this very important public health and safety concern.

A UL-listed carbon monoxide alarm is mandated to keep quiet unless the CO level is above 70 parts per million (ppm) for over an hour! Most furnaces and water heaters, the common culprits of CO leakage, would never run for over an hour straight- hence the alarm would never sound. In fact, if you read the instructions in any UL-listed CO alarm, it says this:

“This unit is designed not to alarm when exposed to a constant level of 30 ppm for 30 days”, and adds that infants, pregnant mothers, and sick or elderly people should take additional precautions! How many homeowners, even the brilliant ones who read your paper, know that their CO alarm is not protecting them from prolonged poisoning?

Interestingly, the symptoms of CO poisoning are ‘flu-like’. Consider that a test for CO in your blood can be quick, simple and non-invasive; then consider if you have ever had flu-like symptoms and had a doctor suggest testing for CO poisoning. Sadly, I bet no doctor has ever mentioned it to you as a possibility.

Prevention is the only real solution- having your water heater and furnace tested for CO is straightforward, and can be performed by any BPI-certified home performance professional. You can find a list of them through our non-profit association:
www.iaerhpp.org

Thanks for making people wiser!
Corbett Lunsford
Technical Director, Green Dream Group
Sources of Carbon Monoxide in Homes

Posted in General Topics, Health & Safety | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off